Media headlines have proclaimed that over two-thirds of Asian Americans support affirmative action in college admissions. These reports stem from a survey by AAPI Data, a polling group media pundits deem authoritative on Asian American policy views. In a new Manhattan Institute
debunks AAPI Data’s polling methodology, arguing that their survey questions intentionally incline respondents to express support for the controversial admissions policy.
In 2022, AAPI Data asked respondents if they favored “affirmative action programs designed to help Black people, women, and other minorities get better access to higher education?” Mukherjee contends that this framing inaccurately connotes equality of opportunity, while previous years’ AAPI Data surveys – and those of other polling groups – more accurately present how affirmative action works: a preferential quota system aiming at equality of outcome. When phrased in that way, Asian American support (like that of the general American public) plummets, and Mukherjee shows that AAPI Data was well-aware of how this question’s framing influences results.
Drawing from leading research on public policy polling, comparing AAPI Data’s 2022 question to its question in past years, and contrasting AAPI Data’s framing to that of leading polling groups like Pew Research Center and the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, Mukherjee shows that the AAPI Data results reveal more about the question Asian Americans were asked than the values they hold.
Mukherjee offers pollsters two recommendations:
Are you interested in supporting the Manhattan Institute’s public-interest research and journalism? As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, donations in support of MI and its scholars’ work are fully tax-deductible as provided by law (EIN #13-2912529).