The Supreme Court will soon hear what may be the most important case of the term, one that epitomizes the broken political culture of our time. Murthy v. Missouri involves, in the words of the district court that first took it up, “the most massive attack against free speech in United States history.” Missouri, Louisiana, and other state, individual, and associational plaintiffs have uncovered substantial evidence of the federal government coercing and otherwise pressuring social media companies to take down constitutionally protected speech.
The plaintiffs sued in May 2022, after revelations by White House press secretary Jen Psaki that federal officials “are in regular touch with these social media platforms” to push the tech companies to take down discussions of COVID-19 policy and other issues of national concern. The discovery process of litigation produced more than 20,000 pages of documents that showed repeated, systematic instances of the government using strong-arm tactics to pressure tech companies into deleting speech.
For example, after badgering Google for what the White House viewed as insufficient action, National Digital Strategy Director Rob Flaherty emailed the company to state that his concern was “shared at the highest (and I mean the highest) levels of the WH,” implying that President Joe Biden was involved. Censored topics included “racial justice, the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the return of U.S. Support of Ukraine.”
Continue reading the entire piece here at The Washington Examiner
______________________
Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow and director of Constitutional Studies at the Manhattan Institute. Follow him on Twitter here.
Photo by Barry Winiker/Getty Images